What actually precipitates an organization’s decision to upgrade its DR capabilities?
How do new DR initiatives get funded in the public sector?
What benefits does the right DR solution provide—even if there is no disaster?
But how exactly would he do it – and who would help?
Eugene Rudy is more than just the Director of IT for the City of St. Marys—a vibrant community of 17 000+ citizens on Georgia’s southern coast, just over the border from Jacksonville. Rudy is executive director of the Georgia chapter of GMIS, the country’s largest association of public-sector IT professionals, and has served in various capacities with GMIS International. So he understands as well as anyone, the difference between adequate and inadequate DR (disaster recovery) preparedness.
And the City’s DR at the start of our story was definitely inadequate. The City was using a combination of tape and external hard drives to back up its various systems. Part of this was due to the kind of unsystematic approach to backup that often characterizes municipal IT organizations. Some was due to the fact that its software vendors—including the developer of its core ERP system—had recommended tape at the time of deployment.
But regardless of how the City’s backups ended up how they were, it was not protected against a real disaster. Fragmented, unreliable backup meant that the City’s 4+TB of data—covering everything from liquor licenses to building permits—was at risk. If a disaster struck the seaside community, it wouldn’t be able to serve its citizens or even pay its employees. Lack of a sufficiently standardized and automated approach to backup also meant the City was spending more than it needed to on data protection.
“Hybrid backup with a Time-Based Cloud Retention fee structure enables us to do the best job of ensuring the continuity of our IT operations while keeping our monthly costs low and predictable.”
City of St. Marys
“We needed more streamlined backup operations, we needed the safety of cloud-based storage, and we needed full confidence in our ability to reconstitute our critical systems no matter what the circumstances,” declares Rudy. “The only question was how to best fulfill those needs.”
As it turned out, Rudy was able to dramatically improve the City’s disaster preparedness using Datto SIRIS solutions. Five factors contributed directly to his ability to do so:
What the City Gained
The engagement with Thinkgard provided the City of St. Marys with multiple benefits. For one thing, all of its systems and data—both virtual and physical—are being reliably backed up without requiring a lot of manual work from its few in-house IT employees. For another, those backups are available both locally and in the cloud. That hybrid model is a big plus to Rudy and his team. “Local backup protects even if you lose your Internet connection, and cloud backup protects you even if your local data center is wiped out,” explains Rudy. “So the combination is essential for full assurance of business continuity.”
Thinkgard’s Datto-enabled DR-as-a-service offering also protects the City financially through a fixed monthly Time-Based Cloud Retention fee, rather than conventional volume-based pricing. “We can’t really control how quickly our data is growing, so a service that charged us by the GB would leave us exposed to higher costs than we could afford,” Rudy says. “Thinkgard’s model, on the other hand, keeps our costs low and predictable.”
Ultimately, however, it is the City’s citizens and businesses that will benefit if and when a disaster strikes—whether that disaster is another major cyclone or merely a crashed server. “People don’t realize how much they depend on their municipal government until something goes wrong,” notes Rudy. “With Datto and Thinkgard, we have dramatically and cost-effectively reduced the risk of that happening.”